Legal Opinion
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Nahas
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 15, 1926No. 3386PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Speaking of the parties as they' stand on the record, the plaintiff brought this action in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to recover dam*57ages from the defendant for personal injuries he had sustained at a grade-crossing on the line of the defendant’s railroad extending from Albany to Binghampton in the State of New York. The plaintiff had a verdict. To the judgment that followed, the defendant has directed this writ, charging many errors in the trial and raising for review many questions, the main one being whether, on a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dyer v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dolfini v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Dolan v. . Delaware and Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Hall v. VanderpoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Chamberlain v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Cafasso v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.