Carter-Crume Co. v. Peurrung
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. This is a writ of error to review a judgment in favor of Joseph P. Peurrung, as the assignee of a contract of the firm of Peurrung Bros. & Co., against the Carter-Crume Company for $4,977.50. By the contract, the Carter-Crume Company agreed to pay Peurrung Bros. & Co. $3,000 per annum for the term of 3 years and 6% months, in monthly installments of $250, on the 15th…
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. This is a writ of error to review a judgment in favor of Joseph P. Peurrung, as the assignee of a contract of the firm of Peurrung Bros. & Co., against the Carter-Crume Company for $4,977.50. By the contract, the Carter-Crume Company agreed to pay Peurrung Bros. & Co. $3,000 per annum for the term of 3 years and 6% months, in monthly installments of $250, on the 15th day of each month, in consideration of the release by Peurrung Bros. & Co. of all their rights under a contract…
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is insisted on the part of the plaintiff in error that, at the time of the commencement of the first suit upon which recovery has been had, there was due upon the installments, under the contract, $1,500, which was not included in the recovery in that suit, and which is included in the recovery in this; that the plaintiff below was not entitled to split up his causes of action after the installments became due; that all the installments due were indivisible; and that the recovery for any of them was a bar to a recovery of all the others due at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. HulbertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Baltimore & O. R. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Wilson v. TevisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. North Platte Valley Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.