Legal Opinion

Smith v. Groleske

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2008No. S-12628PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Following a post-divorce visitation dispute, the superior court entered judgment awarding statutory visitation damages and attorney's fees and costs without a requested evidentiary hearing. A subsequent request for reconsideration was denied. Because it was error to enter sanctions without a requested evidentiary hearing and because the court used the wrong statute as the basis for its judgment, it was an abuse of discretion to deny reconsideration. We therefore vacate the judgment and remand for an appropriate evidentiary hearing.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. L.L.M. v. P.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Abraham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mendel-Gleason v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alaskan Adventure Tours, Inc. v. The City and Borough of YakutatAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Houston v. WolpertAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Brotherton v. WarnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API