Legal Opinion

Glover v. Southard

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1994No. 93CA1261PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiffs, Lavern and Athlyn Glover, appeal the trial court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice their complaint against defendant, William Southard, for failure to state a claim. We affirm.

Defendant, an attorney employed by a Greeley bank, drafted a trust agreement by which a settlor designated a non-profit corporation as sole residual beneficiary to the trust corpus which included most of settlor’s property. The agreement named the bank as trustee.

Two months later, defendant drafted a codicil to the settlor’s previously executed will to add a bequest of a sum of money…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Perreira v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. McDonald v. Lakewood Country ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Schreiner v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Noble v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, P.C. v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Turkey Creek, LLC v. RosaniaColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Baker v. Wood, Ris & Hames, Professional Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WeissColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API