Legal Opinion

Smith v. Potter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Trespass on the ease. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, who was a brakeman on the railroad of which defendant was receiver, sues for an injury which he received by having an arm crushed while coupling cars. The accident is shown to have happened while plaintiff was attempting to couple two cars which had been brought loaded to Monroe by another road, and the occasion of it is said to have been the loosening and leaning down of the dead-woods of one car which was rather lower than the other, whereby as the two came together the dead-woods of the lower car went partially under those of the higher one and caught plaintiff’s arm. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw Railroad v. GildersleeveMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API