Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1925No. 14796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

In this opinion Martha Daniel will be called plaintiff and W. L. Jones will! be called intervener.

Plaintiff’s petition alleges she is a Creek freedman and as such had all- tted to her certain lands as a homestead. That in 1910 Richard J. Hill was appointed guardian of the person and estate of plaintiff, that plaintiff reached her majority on December 17, 1919. That on December 18, 1919, and before filing his final report as guardian, Hill caused plaintiff to convey all her property to Francis P. Hill, wife of the guardian; that there was no consideration for the conveyance,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Guaranty State Bank of Okmulgee v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Stuart v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Shuffeldt v. JefcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Devin v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Wyant v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API