Legal Opinion

United States v. Staff Sergeant TAHIR L. MUWWAKKIL

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 26, 2014No. ARMY MISC 20140536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

KRAUSS, Judge:

Appellee is charged with rape and assault consummated by a battery in violation of Articles 120 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 928 (2012). The United States filed a timely appeal with this court pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ, contending that the military judge abused her discretion by striking the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety in light of a Jencks Act violation, thus excluding evidence that is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MuwwakkilCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. MuwwakkilCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API