Legal Opinion

Truesdale v. Town of Greenwich

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 21, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

By this complaint, dated June 25th, 1931, the plaintiffs sought an injunction and other equitable relief against the defendant upon substantially the following allegations: That theretofore the defendant town had received by gift from Robert M. Bruce, now deceased, a certain park known as “Bruce Memorial Park” on certain conditions recited in the deed of gift, to wit: (1) That except for the fourth tract, the land “shall be forever used for the purpose of a public park, to be known as the ‘Bruce Memorial Park,’ and shall be devoted to no other use or purpose, except that the building on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Wheeler v. BedfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. State v. LitmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. McCormick v. Chicago Yacht ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Edward Balf Co. v. Hartford Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Belford v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Sadloski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Brainard v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API