Legal Opinion

Edward Balf Co. v. Hartford Electric Light Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks in this action a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from maintaining a concrete conduit across the Park River and thereby interfering with plaintiff’s access by water to its property located upon the south bank of the river.

The trial court reached the conclusion that the Park River is a navigable river and that the conduit main tained over the river obstructs its navigation and is a public nuisance, but that the injunction prayed for could not issue for the reason that it had not been established that the plaintiff suffers an injury distinct from that which it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Bigelow v. Hartford Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  4. Wheeler v. BedfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  5. Frink v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Sisters of St. Joseph Corp. v. Atlas Sand, Gravel & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Herbert v. SmythSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API