Legal Opinion

Briscoe and Others v. the Commonwealth's Bk. of Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 30, 1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

33 U.S. 118 (____)

8 Pet. 118

GEORGE BRISCOE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH'S BANK OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.

THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND COMMONALTY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFFS

v.

GEORGE MILN.

Supreme Court of United States.

The case was argued by Mr White and Mr Wilde, for the plaintiffs in error; and by Mr Hardin and Mr Bibb, for the defendant.

GEORGE BRISCOE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. THE COMMONWEALTH'S BANK OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.

THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND COMMONALTY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFFS v GEORGE MILN.

ON a certificate of division in opinion of the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briscoe v. Commonwealth's Bank of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1834

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Frischer & Co. v. Bakelite CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. McClure v. OwensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Ableman v. BoothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Marrs v. MummeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API