Ableman v. Booth
Wisconsin Supreme Court
MOTIONS TO THE REMITTITURS. The facts in these cases can very readily be gathered from the opinion of Chief Justice Dixon. Mr. Justice Paine having been of counsel for Booth in the cases, took no part in the decision of the motions, and the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Cole disagreeing upon the question presented, the motions were denied by an order made in open court, but no opinion has been filed by Justice Cole.
1Opinion of the Court
■ DixoN, C. J»
On the 22d day of September last, and during the present term of, this court, the United States District Attorney for the district of Wisconsin, D. A. J. Upham, Esq., in behalf of the Attorney General of the United States, appeared before this court, and by motions, entitled in these cases, asked leave to file with the clerk, two mandates or remittiturs, one in each of the cases, from the supreme court of the United States. The motions were reduced to writing, filed with the clerk, and the attention of the court called to them by the district attorney, but no argument whatever…
2Cases cited199 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parker v. Judicial Inquiry CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Siefert v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Whiton v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870