Legal Opinion

Hefner v. Maiorana

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 10, 2003No. A02A1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

Diane E. Hefner and her husband, Scott Hefner, appeal from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant, Suzanne O. Maiorana, in this personal injury action arising from an automobile collision. The Hefners enumerate as error the trial court’s refusal to give three of their requested jury instructions concerning which vehicle has the right of way when approaching an intersection. Because the principles in the requested charges were adequately covered by the trial court, we affirm.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Locke v. VonaltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Edwards v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. PLOOF TRUCK LINES, INC. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. McDonald v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trotman v. VELOCITEACH PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Wynn v. City of Warner RobinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Morita v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Preston v. SABETZAMCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API