United States v. Cannon
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of signing a false official document with intent to deceive and with larceny of $11,373.00, property of the U.S. Government, in violation of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 921 (1982), respectively. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for thirteen months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to the grade of Private E-l.
Appellant asserts that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during the post-trial proceedings of his…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. EuringU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988