United States v. Euring
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION
DeFORD, Senior Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of wrongful use of cocaine, a violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (Supp.1987). His approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three months, forfeiture of $447.00 pay per month for three months, and reduction to Private El.
Relying on the decision of this court in United States v. Hallums, 26 M.J. 838 (A.C.M.R.1988), the appellant contends that there is no tangible proof of record that the convening authority…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. HallumsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. RolandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HilowU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. ManersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. HilowU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989