Legal Opinion

State v. Marine National Exchange Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The sole question before the court is the taxability of the pension payments to be made to Mrs. King. The state contends that a tax is imposed by sec. 72.01 (3) (b), Stats.:

“When a transfer is of property, made without an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth ... by . . . gift, intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after the death of the . . . donor, . . .”

It is our conclusion that this case is controlled by the Estate of Sweet (1955), 270 Wis. 256, 70 N. W. (2d) 645. We there held that no tax was assessable against a widow’s pension provided for by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sweet v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. Michels Pipeline Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Matter of Estate of StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Young v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Antoniewicz v. ReszczynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API