Legal Opinion

State v. Stone

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRCHild, J.

Sec. 72.01, Stats., imposes a tax upon any transfer of property or interest therein or income therefrom in the cases set forth in the subsections. Sub. (3) (b) specifies the case: “When a transfer is of property, made without an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth . . . by . . . gift, intended to take effect *470in possession or enjoyment at or after the death of the . . . donor, . .

Mr. Stone, by his election, altered the rights which he would presumably have at and after retirement in the trust fund created by the company. If he did not elect the joint and survivor option,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dolak v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Sweet v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Estate of StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In re the Estate of EndemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. In re the Estate of HarbordNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Matter of Estate of StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cochrane v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Estate of SchleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In re Estate of PattersonCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API