Legal Opinion

Cayce v. City of Hopkinsville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Hobson—

Affirming.

C. H. Cayce owned a lot in Hopkinsville on the northwest corner of Main and Thirteenth streets. The Standard Oil 'Company proposed to purchase the lot at a price agreed on between them if a permit could be obtained from the city for the erection on the lot of a filling station. Cayce and the agent of the Standard Oil Company went before the city authorities and presented an application for the permit. The application was refused on February 9, 1926. On May 18, 1926, Cayce filed this action for a mandamus against the city authorities…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Blundell v. City of West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. A. N. "Ab" Young Co. Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. City of San Antonio v. ZogheibTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. METRO. DEV. COMM'N v. Pinnacle Media, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API