METRO. DEV. COMM'N v. Pinnacle Media, LLC
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
. SULLIVAN, Justice.
Pinnacle Media, LLC, seeks a declaration that a change in the zoning ordinance of the City of Indianapolis concerning billboard location permits is not applicable to its plan to erect 10 billboards in Indianapolis. Because no construction or other work that gave Pinnacle a vested interest in the billboard project had begun on the billboards at the time of the ordinance change, the ordinance change did apply to the 10 billboards.
Background
Pinnacle Media, LLC, erects and leases advertising billboards. In July, 1999, after some period of discussion, the City of Indianapolis…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Equicor Development, Inc. v. Westfield-Washington Township Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Fairmount Center Co. v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- BBL, Inc. v. City of AngolaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of WestfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Hoosier Outdoor Advertising Corp. v. RBL Management, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. Town of Plainfield Ex Rel. Plainfield Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.