Legal Opinion
Benshoff v. City of Virginia Beach
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 10, 1998No. CIV. A. 2:97CV975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
DOUMAR, District Judge.
The plaintiffs Gregg Benshoff, et al. moved for partial summary judgment and defendant City of Virginia Beach (“City”) moved for summary judgment. The parties indicated at the hearing that there were no material facts in dispute. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Each of the plaintiffs in this action is a master firefighter employed by the City Fire Department claiming overtime pay for hours furnished to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benshoff v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Cleveland v. City of ElmendorfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Todaro v. Township of UnionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Briggs v. Chesapeake Volunteers in Youth Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Todaro v. Township of UnionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999