Legal Opinion

Ornelas v. Tapestry, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 2, 2021No. 3:18-cv-06453Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOHN ORNELAS, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 18-06453 WHA 12 v. 13 TAPESTRY, INC., ORDER RE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Defendant. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this wage-and-hour putative class action, defendant moves for partial summary 18 judgment. Because plaintiff has failed to show that defendant did not provide rest and meal 19 breaks or discouraged plaintiff from taking adequate breaks, partial summary judgment as to 20 claims four through seven is GRANTED. Furthermore, because plaintiff raises no genuine 21…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Navajo Nation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API