Nystrom v. Lee
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Nelson county; Fisk, J. Action by G. B. Nystrom against John Lee. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals. By practical settlement and location, parties may compromise a disputed boundary line.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Nelson county; Fisk, J. Action by G. B. Nystrom against John Lee. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals. By practical settlement and location, parties may compromise a disputed boundary line. Lecomte v. Toudouze, 17 S. W. 1047; Cox v. Dougherty, 36 S. W. 184; Simmons v. Mclnney, 63 S. W. 92; Brummel v. Harris, 63 S. W. 497; Hills v. Ludvig, 24 N. E. 596; Clayton v. Feig, 54 N. E. 149; Hastings v. Stark, 36 Cal. 122; St. Bede College v. Weber, 48 N. E. 165; Miller v. Mills Co., 82 N. W. 1038; Sherman v. Hastings, 46 N. W. 1084; LeCompte v. Lueders, 51 N. W.…
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff is owner of the N. E. %. of section 27, in township 149 N., of range 57 W., in Nelson county, and the controversy in this case arises over the lines dividing the plaintiff’s land from the S. E. J4 owned, and the N. W. J4 of the same section occupied, by the defendant. The action is brought for damages for trespass upon strips along the south and west Sides, claimed by plaintiff to be a part of the N. E. and there*563fore belonging to him, but occupied some years by the defendant. One Gjedestad, the county surveyor of Nelson county, testified that at the request of the plaintiff he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Randall v. Burk TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
- Knight v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hanson v. Township of Red RockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Odegaard v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Nystrom v. TempletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908