Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. Garland
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This is an action on a promissory note executed by Defendants Burt Garland and Donald M. McKay in their capacity as general partners of Thirty-Thirty Partnership (hereinafter referred to as “Thirty-Thirty”), an Oklahoma limited partnership. It is asserted that this Court has jurisdiction of the action by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy. The matter is now before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Defendants have filed a brief in support of their motion and Plaintiff has filed a brief in opposition to the same.
Pu…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McMillin v. First National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L. Richard Wolff v. L. Carl WolffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. Aphex BioCleanse Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024