Legal Opinion

Roy Padgett v. James E. Donald

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 4, 2005No. 03-16527PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In a case of first impression for our circuit, we decide whether the United States and Georgia Constitutions permit the Georgia Department of Corrections to compel incarcerated felons to submit saliva samples for DNA profiling, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 24-4-60. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and the Georgia Department of Corrections. Because we conclude that the statute does not violate the Fourth Amendment, the search and seizure provisions of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Boxer X v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Kohler v. EngladeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API