Legal Opinion
Kizer v. Tristar Risk Mgmt.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 26, 2017No. G052558PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAronson, J.
*833Plaintiffs and appellants Valerie Kizer and Sharal Williams (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed this putative class action against their former *834employer, defendant and respondent Tristar Risk Management (Tristar), alleging Tristar failed to pay Plaintiffs and its other claims examiners overtime compensation because it misclassified them as exempt from California's overtime laws.
After twice continuing the hearing for supplemental briefing and evidence, the trial court denied Plaintiffs' class certification motion because they failed to present substantial evidence showing their claims were…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Payton v. CSI Elec. Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McCleery v. Allstate Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Blair v. INFORM Software CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Cirrincione v. American Scissor LiftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cobos v. Nat. Gen. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.