Legal Opinion

Giunta v. Mobil Corp. Employee Severance Plan

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 6, 2002No. CIV.A.G-01-677PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KENT, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), challenging the Plan Administrator’s denial of severance benefits. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs and Defendant’s competing Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons articulated below, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion is hereby DENIED. Plaintiffs claims are conse quently hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crowell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  2. Stone v. Unocal Termination Allowance PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API