Giunta v. Mobil Corp. Employee Severance Plan
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), challenging the Plan Administrator’s denial of severance benefits. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs and Defendant’s competing Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons articulated below, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion is hereby DENIED. Plaintiffs claims are conse quently hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crowell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Stone v. Unocal Termination Allowance PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008