Legal Opinion
Stone v. Unocal Termination Allowance Plan
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 14, 2008No. Civil Action H-06-2770PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memokandum Opinion and Order
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the motion for summary judgment of the defendants Unocal Termination Allowance Plan, Unocal Employee Redeployment Plan, and Unocal Retirement Plan’s (collectively, “Plans”). 1 Dkt. 40. Having reviewed the motion, the response, the reply, and the applicable law, the court finds that the Administrator and Appeals Committee did not abuse their discretion. Accordingly, the Plans’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
Factual Background
The Merger
On August 10, 2005, Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) contracted to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stone v. UNOCAL Termination Allowance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Stone v. Unocal TerminationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009