Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1999No. 98 CIV 1464(MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sarah Goldstein commenced this putative class action suit against defendant Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & Bertolotti (“Hutton”), a New York City law firm, for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692o (“FDCPA”). Hutton moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons that follow, Hutton’s motion is denied.
Background
According to the complaint, plaintiff incurred a personal debt to Stahl York Avenue Co.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brian Sheppard v. Leon Beerman, as an Individual and in His Official Capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jennifer Lynn Romea v. Heiberger & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart, Inc. v. DowlingCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & BertolottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- 2101 Albermarle v. RosaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999