Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & Bertolotti
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 2001No. 98CIV.1464(MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Sarah Goldstein commenced this purported class action against defendant Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carrol & Ber-tolotti (“Hutton”), a New York City law firm, for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”). In a prior opinion, I denied Hutton’s motion to dismiss, but stated that “[a]ll the factual issues, including the conclusory allegation that Hutton is a debt collector, are subject to reexamination after the completion of discovery on a motion for summary judgment.” Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sarah Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & BertolottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sibersky v. Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler & Schwartz, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Keauhou Master Homeowners Ass'n v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2004