Lawhorn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals reversed and reformed the judgment to reflect an acquittal, holding the evidence insufficient. Lawhom v. State, 843 S.W.2d 268 (Tex. App. — Austin 1992). We granted the State’s petitions for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in its sufficiency analysis.1
The Court of Appeals adequately set forth the relevant facts which we adopt verbatim as follows:
Appellant was arrested for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Lucero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dusek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Duran v. .StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Bordman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Eldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.