Legal Opinion
INF, LTD. v. Spectro Alloys Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1988No. Civil 4-86-705PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
On January 30, 1987, the court granted the motion of defendant Spectro Alloys Corp. (Spectro) to refer this case to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to determine whether it would be an unreasonable practice to require Spectro to pay “undercharges” for the difference between the tariff rate that the parties believed was appropriate and the tariff rate that INF now says is correct. 651 F.Supp. 1405 (D.Minn.1987). In a decision issued on February 23, 1988, the ICC, by a 3-2 vote, determined that it would be an unreasonable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Western Transportation Company v. Wilson and Company, Inc. And Wilson Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Seaboard System Railroad, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Inf, Ltd. v. Spectro Alloys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Breman's Express Co. v. Mitchell Milling Co. (In Re Breman's Express Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Ferguson Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Marine Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.