Legal Opinion
Clauss v. Danker
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1967No. 64 Civ. 2608PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, suing as an administrator in this wrongful death action, 1 brings this motion pursuant to Rules 1, 26(b) and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking disclosure of particulars regarding the insurance coverage of defendants Bertha M. Danker and C & M Leasing Company (sued herein as “C & M Equipment Company”). There is no contention that the information, if disclosed, would be admissible upon the trial of the action, or that it is calculated to lead to discovery of relevant evidence. The motion is denied.
While the question of disclosure of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kerr Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Superior Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Johanek v. AberleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James G. Thomas, Jr., Brother and Next of Kin of Karen G. Thomas v. Elizabeth Oldfield, M.D.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Mampe v. Ayerst LaboratoriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Szarmack v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Guy v. TongletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Benoit v. International Harvester CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.