Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beane v. City of Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2007No. 2006-1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

*554{¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of mandamus filed by relators, Captain John C. Post Lodge No. 44 of the Fraternal Order of Police and Randy Beane, a member, to compel respondents, the city of Dayton, the Dayton City Commission, the Dayton Civil Service Board, and various city officials, to comply with R.C. 9.481, a recently enacted statute prohibiting political subdivisions from requiring their employees, as a condition of employment, to reside in any specific area of the state. For the following reasons, we grant respondents’ motion and dismiss the cause.

Dayton Charter

{¶ 2}…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Bennett v. LimeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Gaydosh v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Stamps v. Automatic Data Processing BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Zeigler v. ZumbarOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Deiter v. McGuireOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Dreamer v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Mason v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API