State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The major issue on this appeal is whether the evidence that defendant knew the television sets were stolen at the time he received them was sufficient to go to the jury. If it was, defendant’s motion to dismiss was properly denied. Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, as we are required to do, State v. Jones, 32 N.C. App. 408, 232 S.E. 2d 475, cert. denied and app. dism. 292 N.C. 643, 235 S.E. 2d 63 (1977), we find the following: In May or June 1977, defendant purchased from James Williams two color TVs and two stereos, still in their sealed boxes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SaultsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. McLawhornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SouthardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. LoualiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011