Legal Opinion

Savitt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 13, 1932No. 4743, 4753PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The indictment charged Rothfuss, an assistant cashier of the New Jersey National Bank and Trust Company of Newark, New Jersey, with misapplication of the bank’s funds and charged Savitt, a'depositor, with aiding and abetting him. Both were convicted and sentenced, and both have appealed.

Savitt first assigns error to the trial court in refusing his motion for a continuance based on the absence of a material witness. Savitt recognizes that the action of a trial court upon an application for continuance is purely a matter of discretion, not subject to review unless it be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  2. Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Paul J. D. Logsdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Collazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Troy v. Post, Jr. v. United States of America, Bill M. Allen v. United States of America, Leroy W. Pickett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API