Warren v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In'Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Ralph E. Campbell, Judge. Robert K. Warren was convicted of introducing intoxicating liquor from outside of the state of Oklahoma into that part of the state which was formerly Indian Territory, in violation of Act March 1, 1895, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CAREAND, Circuit Judge.
[1] Plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant, complains of a conviction and sentence for introducing intoxicating liquor from outside the state of Oklahoma into that part of the state which was formerly the Indian Territory (28 Stat. 693). It is urged that the statute under which the defendant was convicted, as limited to interstate commerce by the Oklahoma Enabling Act, is unconstitutional, because it discriminates between the states in respect of trade and commerce in intoxicating liquors. This contention was made in Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United States, 236…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Creekmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Searway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- George Stine Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Salinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.