Legal Opinion

Steele v. Starr

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 18, 2000No. 2:99-cv-00162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NANGLE, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292(b), Chief Judge Roger L. Wollman, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, designated this writer to handle the within matter. That designation was necessitated by the action of all of the judges of the Eastern District of Arkansas in recusing themselves on December 21, 1999. The matter before the Court is an October 12, 1999 letter grievance filed by Julie Hiatt Steele, adopting Francis T. Mandanici’s June 4, 1999 letter grievance (“Mandanici IV”). This Court will now proceed.

Pursuant to Rule V(A) of the Model Rules…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delfin Ramos Colon v. United States Attorney for the District of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Application of Randolph PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Larry A. Eaton v. William D. GerdesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. McDougalDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Flash StaffingDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  2. Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API