Legal Opinion

Haynes v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 9, 2020No. 18-3278-cv(L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-3278-cv(L) Haynes, et al. v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Watts v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API