Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Truemper
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 26, 1993No. 92 C 6900PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
On October 14, 1992, plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint alleging the violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Before the court are the motions of defendant Regency Savings Bank (“Regency”) and defendants Joel Truemper, Donald Bisch and the City of Naperville to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth in this order the court grants defendants’ motions to dismiss.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
According to the defendants, Regency…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oppenheim v. I.C. System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Iris Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh, L.L.P., et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Renner v. Derin Acquisition Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Oppenheim v. I.C. System, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
- Battye v. Child Support Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.