Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Cain

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1926No. Appeal 129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County refusing to allow: an appeal from the County Court. M. B. Cain having obtained a judgment against Joseph Barnett in the County Court, caused an execution to issue and the sheriff levied upon certain personal property in the possession of the defendant in the execution. Hyman Barnett, the appellant, claimed the property, and an interpleader proceeding resulted in the framing of an issue to try the title, in which Hyman Barnett was plaintiff and Cain, the execution creditor, the defendant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Barlow v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Bowersox v. Weigle & MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Kendig v. BinkleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. C. Trevor Dunham, Inc. v. Van OrsdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API