Legal Opinion

Unigard Ins. Co. v. Tremont

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 20, 1981No. File No. 1020PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff, an insurance carrier, against its insured and her attorney, to obtain reimbursement for basic reparations benefits paid to its insured under the no-fault provisions of an automobile insurance policy. The trial judge rendered a default judgment for failure to plead against the defendant insured and rendered judgment for the defendant attorney. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment rendered for the defendant attorney. The sole issue presented is whether General Statutes 38-325 (b)2 imposes a lien on the proceeds of a settlement that come into the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Brill v. UlreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. McAnerney v. McAnerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Della GhelfaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. GhelfaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Omar v. MezvinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Silver v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API