Legal Opinion
McAnerney v. McAnerney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 1973PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for a declaratory judgment seeking to determine whether he continued to be bound by the terms of a separation agreement between him and his former wife, the named defendant, hereinafter called Mrs. McAnerney. Also named as a defendant was Walter A. Stoeeker, against whom was made the claim that because of his continued cohabitation with Mrs. McAnerney, the plaintiff was caused embarrassment and financial loss. Both defendants demurred to the amended complaint on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action against either of them. The court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Christiano v. ChristianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- McAdam v. SheldonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Lombardi v. J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.