Legal Opinion

Perry v. Williard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1967PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

In Gebhart v. Gladden, 243 Or 145, 412 P2d 29 (1966), we held that an indigent person on probation must be supplied with appointed counsel at a revocation hearing if sentence had not been previously imposed. Today we have a case in which a sentence had been pronounced after a felony conviction, but the execution thereof had been suspended during good behavior on probation. Probation was later revoked at a hearing, in the absence of counsel, and the indigent prisoner sought postconviction relief. He appeals a circuit court judgment denying relief.

The state relies upon a general proposition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. EdelbluteIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gebhart v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. DeAngelo v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Application of StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Warren v. Parole BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Roberts v. HockerNevada Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API