Legal Opinion

People v. Moody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the *937contention of defendant that County Court erred in allowing prosecution witnesses to testify regarding a prior uncharged drug crime. That testimony was properly admitted to prove that defendant possessed cocaine at the time in question with intent to sell (see, People v Hernandez, 71 NY2d 233, 245-246; People v Stephens, 209 AD2d 999, lv denied 84 NY2d 1039). Further, the probative value of the testimony exceeded its potential prejudicial effect, and the People properly obtained a prior ruling on its admissibility (see,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. KonigsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. LushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API