Legal Opinion

People v. Lowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has not demonstrated that he was denied a fair trial by less than meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1022). " '[A] simple disagreement with strategies, tactics or the scope of possible cross-examination, weighed long after trial, does not suffice’ to satisfy defendant’s burden of establishing ineffective assistance of counsel” (People v Brandon, 237 AD2d 980 [decided herewith], quoting People v Flores, supra, at 187). Defendant was not deprived of his statutory right to a speedy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. HobotNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API