Legal Opinion

People v. Lush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We held this case, reserved decision and remitted the matter to Ontario County Court to conduct a hearing on the issue whether the 14-month delay between defendant’s arrest and indictment was unreasonable or resulted from a good faith determination to defer prosecution for investigation or for other sufficient reasons (People v Lush,

*897234 AD2d 991). At the hearing, a police officer involved in the investigation testified for the People. The court properly concluded that, although some prejudice may have resulted from the delay, the determination…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. LubowNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. SkaarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. AyusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API