Pohl v. MH Sub I, LLC
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge
This Court has considered, without hearing, Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 41, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 50. Although Plaintiff may be chomping at the bit to get to trial, Defendant's motion is GRANTED . Plaintiff's motion is DENIED.
I
This is a case about teeth. Specifically, this is a case about alleged copyright infringement of photographs of teeth.
Dr. Mitchell A. Pohl is a practicing dentist in Boca Raton, Florida. ECF No. 41, at 2. Starting around the year 2000, Pohl began taking…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Alveda King Beal v. Paramount Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.