Legal Opinion · Dissent

England v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1993No. 91-00511-CRPublished

1DissentWilson, Justice

The issue presented in this appeal is whether evidence of extraneous offenses is admissible when: (1) the accused alleges entrapment as a defense, and (2) the extraneous offenses sought to be admitted occurred in the context of the previous relationship between the accused and the informant-law enforcement agent alleged to have used improper inducements on behalf of the police. From the conclusion reached by the majority to this question, I respectfully dissent.

Evidence inadmissible for one reason may be admissible for another. The State may not be able to introduce evidence of appellant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ivatury v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Donnell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Gilliam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API