Legal Opinion

Carias v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1997No. 9503-01693; CA A92361PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Petitioner appeals from the judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief in which he alleged that he was denied adequate assistance of trial counsel. We affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of one count of delivery of a controlled substance arising from a drug buy made by an undercover officer. Petitioner was in the company of Brandy, a female juvenile. It was Brandy who handed the drugs to the officer and who had the money when arrested. At trial, petitioner testified, admitting that he was present when the officer purchased drugs from Brandy but denying that he negotiated the drug…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mellem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Saldana-Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Burcham v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API