United States Ex Rel. Rubinstein v. Mulcahy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The increased bail was, we are told, by far the highest ever set in any criminal case in the Southern District of New York. The offense charged, though a serious one, is not punishable by penalties unusually severe. The urge to flee cannot be unusually great. The ties that bind the petitioner to his home were not shown to be unusually slight. So far as appears, the inference that the relator was planning to flee must be drawn from the fact that he possessed the material means to make that as possible as could ample means which he has made readily available.
Yet such ability to flee as that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. HoySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Moore v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. MotlowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Skeffington v. KatzeffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Colyer v. SkeffingtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- People Ex Rel. Lobell v. McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Koen v. LongDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969
- Edwin Arnold Kraft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Hobbs v. LINDSEY, SHERIFF, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.