Legal Opinion
Manson v. Reed
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1986No. B010072PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS (Gary), J. *
Appellants, Stewart Reed and Millie Reed, are appealing from a judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages for fraud against them and in favor of respondents after a court trial. The primary issue revolves around a real estate sales transaction and whether or not the antideficiency provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 580b prevent recovery of damages against the appellants. If the answer is in the negative, appellants also raise the following issues: insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment against Stewart Reed; that punitive damages…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Campbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Mabee v. Nurseryland Garden Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Webber v. Inland Empire Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Guild Mortgage Co. v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Finalco, Inc. v. RooseveltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.